Betrayed by Justice: The Shocking Tactics of Prosecutor Bradley Endicott in the Ryan Brandstrom Case
In a case that has rocketed to the forefront of legal controversy, Ryan Brandstrom faces charges for possession or distribution of amphetamine, spotlighting a shocking misuse of prosecutorial power. The prosecution, led by Bradley Endicott, has been accused of employing tactics that have severely compromised the integrity of the legal process.
The ordeal began with a raid in December 2023, escalating to an ambush in August 2024, where Brandstrom was confronted by armed agents while shopping. This dramatic arrest followed Endicott's broken promise to notify Brandstrom of his court date, leaving both him and his community in shock.
One of the most disturbing aspects of this case is the prosecution's year-long deception regarding the presence of fentanyl in the substances involved.
One of the most disturbing revelations was the prosecution's year-long deception about fentanyl being mixed with the amphetamine. This misinformation was only corrected in January 2025, revealing a pattern of deceit used to manipulate plea negotiations, similar to tactics seen in other cases.
Endicott also falsely claimed mandatory minimum sentences, misinforming Brandstrom of a 15-year sentence when no such minimum exists. This deception lasted for 10 months, skewing the defense's strategy and highlighting a broader issue of prosecutorial misconduct.
Moreover, Endicott falsely claimed mandatory minimum sentences for the charges, stating a 15-year total when no such minimum exists for amphetamine under the law.
This case exemplifies how such misconduct can erode justice, leaving emotional scars on Brandstrom, his family, and the community. The tactics used are described as "shocking the conscience," demanding a reevaluation of justice administration to prioritize fairness over coercion.
TOP STORIES
